Office of the Special Narcotics Prosecutor & Drug Charges

The Impact of the Office of the Special Narcotics Prosecutor on Drug Charges in New York City

In the city that never sleeps, the battle against drug-related crimes has taken a formidable turn with the Office of the Special Narcotics Prosecutor (OSNP) in New York City at the forefront. As a criminal defense attorney navigating the tumultuous waters of drug charges, it is impossible to ignore the seismic shifts in the legal landscape catalyzed by the relentless efforts of the OSNP. It’s important to understand that there are far-reaching consequences as a result of the OSNP’s crackdown on drug crimes. If you’re facing drug-related charges in New York, we can help. Contact Sosinksy Law now for a free consultation.

The Rise of the Special Narcotics Prosecutor

Established in 1971, the OSNP was created in response to the escalating drug epidemic gripping New York City. Tasked with investigating and prosecuting narcotics offenses, the office operates independently from the district attorney’s offices and holds jurisdiction over all five boroughs. Over the years, the OSNP has evolved into a formidable entity, employing a specialized team of prosecutors and investigators dedicated to combating drug-related crimes.

Unraveling the Web: OSNP Investigations

The OSNP’s modus operandi involves strategic and targeted investigations to dismantle drug trafficking organizations operating within the city. Employing sophisticated surveillance techniques, undercover operations, and collaboration with various law enforcement agencies, the OSNP leaves no stone unturned in its pursuit of those involved in the drug trade. This aggressive approach has undoubtedly led to an uptick in drug-related arrests and charges across New York City.

Multi-Pronged Approach

In order to fulfill its public safety mission and reduce arrests and incarceration, SNP developed a multi-pronged approach to strategic enforcement that includes Supply Reduction, Overdose Death Investigations, Prescription Drug Investigations, Community Impact, and Treatment Alternatives.

Supply Reduction

SNP is dedicated to preventing overdose deaths by eliminating large quantities of hazardous drugs from the upper echelons of the supply chain. New York City plays a pivotal role as a regional hub for the distribution of narcotics supplied by international trafficking organizations. These drugs pass through the city, making their way to local distributors and organizations in neighboring states.

Overdose Death Investigations

Through the examination of overdose deaths, SNP and its partners aim to uncover the suppliers of lethal drugs, with the ultimate goal of preventing future fatalities. By fostering a strong collaboration with public health agencies, SNP is able to stay informed about emerging lethal substances that affect the community, allowing for the development of effective strategies to combat this issue.

Drugs And Violence

SNP is dedicated to safeguarding neighborhoods in New York City against the disruptive impact of drug-related violence. Our investigations encompass a diverse range of organizations, from street gang affiliates to deeply entrenched narcotics distribution groups. With an unwavering commitment, our office allocates resources to empower and fortify communities affected by narcotics-related crime.

Prescription Drug Investigations

SNP’s Prescription Drug Investigation Unit (PDIU), established in 2011, is widely renowned for its expertise in combating illegal trafficking of prescription drugs. The unit focuses on investigating and prosecuting individuals involved, including corrupt medical practitioners. Through enhanced regulatory systems, improved education for doctors, and increased public awareness, the supply of diverted prescription drugs in New York City has significantly diminished as a result of these enforcement efforts.

Community Impact

The SNP responds to community complaints regarding narcotics trafficking by conducting thorough investigations and offering valuable resources to neighborhoods. Assistant District Attorneys collaborate closely with the NYPD to address concerns related to drug crimes and associated violence. Moreover, the Community Outreach Unit actively engages with community and religious leaders, block associations, and the New York City Housing Authority. Regular consultations with NYPD officials ensure the development of effective strategies to combat crime. Following the completion of an investigation and the removal of a drug organization from a building or neighborhood, dedicated resources are allocated to provide comprehensive community support services.

Treatment Alternatives

Eligible felony defendants receive a comprehensive range of services aimed at their rehabilitation. These services include substance use treatment, mental health support, cognitive behavioral therapy, educational and vocational training, case management, and various types of prosocial programming. For the past 30 years, SNP’s Alternative Sentencing Division has been at the forefront of providing treatment as an alternative to incarceration through its pioneering Drug Treatment Alternatives to Prison (DTAP) programs. Additionally, our experienced office staff assists in screening applicants for Judicial Diversion and Manhattan Felony Alternatives to Incarceration Court.

Impact on Drug Charges In New York

The increased vigilance and efficacy of the OSNP have resulted in a surge of drug charges, leaving criminal defense attorneys grappling with an expanding caseload. The office’s emphasis on prosecuting not only street-level offenders but also higher echelons of drug trafficking organizations has broadened the spectrum of individuals facing charges. This shift presents a unique set of challenges for defense attorneys, requiring them to navigate intricate legal frameworks and mounting evidence brought forth by the specialized prosecutors.

Legal Complexities and Defense Strategies

The OSNP’s zealous pursuit of drug offenders has brought forth a wave of legal complexities that demand a nuanced and adaptive defense strategy. From challenges to the legality of searches and seizures to scrutinizing the methods employed by undercover agents, criminal defense attorneys must be well-versed in navigating the intricacies of narcotics cases. As the OSNP relies heavily on confidential informants and undercover operations, defense attorneys must also be adept at uncovering potential misconduct or entrapment.

Nonviolent Offenders Caught in the Crossfire

While the OSNP’s mission to eradicate drug-related crimes is commendable, the net it casts often ensnares nonviolent offenders grappling with addiction or low-level involvement in the drug trade. The punitive approach to drug offenses, with a focus on incarceration rather than rehabilitation, raises questions about the impact on communities and individuals. Criminal defense attorneys find themselves not only fighting legal battles but also advocating for fair and just outcomes, particularly for those who may be better served by treatment and support systems.

Contact Our NYC Criminal Defense Attorney Now

The Office of the Special Narcotics Prosecutor in New York City stands as a formidable force in the ongoing war against drug-related crimes. As a criminal defense attorney, navigating the shifting landscape wrought by the OSNP requires a comprehensive understanding of the legal intricacies involved. While the crackdown on drug offenses is undoubtedly intended to make the city safer, it raises important questions about the collateral damage inflicted on nonviolent offenders and the need for a balanced and rehabilitative approach in the pursuit of justice.

In this high-stakes arena, defense attorneys play a crucial role in safeguarding the rights of individuals caught in the crossfire and advocating for a fair and equitable legal system. If you’re facing drug charges in New York, do not delay. Contact our experienced NYC criminal defense lawyer at Sosinsky Law now to learn more about how we can help.

SOS? CONTACT SOSINSKY

A successful contractor was arrested and charged with felony possession of a loaded firearm and Class C felony possession of marijuana based upon the seizure of these items in a search pursuant to warrant. As has been well advertised, in almost all gun cases in NYC, prosecutors will insist on state prison sentences even for those willing to plead guilty. After presentation of mitigating evidence however, Mr. Sosinsky was able to negotiate a sentence of nine months in jail for his client, meaning his client was out in six months.

A young man who had been a heralded star high school hoopster in Brooklyn was indicted as part of a large multidefendant fraudulent check cashing conspiracy. The client unfortunately had previously been involved in a similar prosecution and worse yet had been arrested during the pendency of the federal case for yet again committing a similar offense. Notwithstanding these hurdles, Mr. Sosinsky was able to convince the federal judge to spare his client a prison sentence and allow him to earn his freedom while on probation.

Mr. Sosinsky represented a prominent attorney accused of assaulting and endangering the welfare of his 13 year son. It turned out that the child was being used as a pawn by the client’s ex-wife and that the incident at the heart of the case involved proper disciplining of a difficult and, at times, violent child. Eventually, the charges against the lawyer were dismissed.

Mr. Sosinsky obtained a verdict of not-guilty of murder in the execution style shooting of a young man involved in gang activities in Harlem, New York City. By demonstrating important differences in the description of the shooter from witnesses called by the prosecution, Mr. Sosinsky was able to raise valid doubts about the correctness of the identifications made at trial.

A few years back, Mr. Sosinsky represented a Manhattan man who was arrested after stabbing his wife in the neck numerous times with a knife in their Upper West Side apartment. The client was indicted for attempted murder. However, after having the client examined by a forensic psychiatrist, it became evident that a compelling insanity defense was in order. Eventually, the prosecutors involved were unable to adequately prepare to counter this defense and the case was dismissed.

Free Case Consultation